On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:44:56PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > If we don't have capabilities we can deal with, return a different > error so the backends can handle it separately (they already do).
Looks good to me. Jonas > > Signe-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > --- > src/evdev.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/evdev.c b/src/evdev.c > index 9c6d116..d8dff65 100644 > --- a/src/evdev.c > +++ b/src/evdev.c > @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ evdev_device_create(struct libinput_seat *seat, > struct evdev_device *device; > char devname[256] = "unknown"; > int fd; > + int unhandled_device = 0; > > /* Use non-blocking mode so that we can loop on read on > * evdev_device_data() until all events on the fd are > @@ -645,6 +646,7 @@ evdev_device_create(struct libinput_seat *seat, > goto err; > > if (device->seat_caps == 0) { > + unhandled_device = 1; > goto err; > } > > @@ -668,7 +670,8 @@ err: > if (fd >= 0) > close_restricted(libinput, fd); > evdev_device_destroy(device); > - return NULL; > + > + return unhandled_device ? EVDEV_UNHANDLED_DEVICE : NULL; > } > > int > -- > 1.8.4.2 > > _______________________________________________ > wayland-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
