2012/9/28 David Herrmann <[email protected]>:
> Hi Bill
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Bill Spitzak <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This sounds like a really good idea!
>>
>> What are you doing about UTF-8? Any modern terminal better handle it and at
>> least display glyphs for every valid UTF-8 encoded character. Also important
>> is that it must not barf and must display a glyph for every byte if the
>> sequence coming in is not valid UTF-8.
>
> You can have a look at tsm_utf8_mach_*() in:
> https://github.com/dvdhrm/kmscon/blob/master/src/tsm_unicode.c

greate! TSM is what I want from ksmcom !

>
> TSM does already handle UTF-8 exclusively. And it shows one glyph for
> each correctly or wrongly parsed UTF-8 character (which is at most
> 4-bytes). If that's not suitable for your use-cases, feel free to file
> a bug-report at github.com or send patches.
>
> Regards
> David
> _______________________________________________
> wayland-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel

Reply via email to