On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 15:35 -0700, Scott Moreau wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Stone <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi, > > On 7 March 2012 22:21, Scott Moreau <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's nothing fancy about this, we just set a timer and > simulate > > events using states 2 and 3 for repeat-up and repeat-down > events. > > > Did you think about just using a single event, rather than the > separate repeat press/release events? If nothing else, it > saves > clients the hassle of processing two events they know are > always > guaranteed to immediately follow each other ... > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > If it doesn't cause a problem, we can do whatever is best. After all, > it's a single line change here.
The difference is that press-press-press-release is detectable as auto-repeat by the client, whereas press-release-press-release-press-release is not. Toolkits might need that information. regards, Michael _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
