https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98731
--- Comment #4 from Jonas Ådahl <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Pekka Paalanen from comment #3)
> I think we already have all the answers, we really just need to agree on the
> place to document it all.
>
> wayland-egl-core.h, living in Wayland repository, would be a very convenient
> place at least for starters. We could polish the EGL spec there in the
> public without the overhead of going through e.g. Khronos. Once it's good,
> we could see if we need to get it stamped by Khronos in e.g.
> EGL_KHR_platform_wayland.
Sounds good to me.
>
> Should we also have EGL implementors' notes? In the same place or a
> different place? E.g. explaining how you define your own private Wayland
> protocol extensions. Maybe that should be a chapter in the Wayland docbook
> instead?
Sounds like the docbook makes more sense for that, and just leave wayland-egl.h
(and later EGL_KHR_platform_wayland) for specifying expected behaviour.
>
> Or put everything in the docbook?
The docbook IMHO is more inaccessible (harder to find, and doesn't contain any
API specification so far), so I'd put my vote on wayland-egl.h for now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
wayland-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-bugs
