On 12/17/15 3:50 PM, Efimov, Alexander wrote:
>
> Hi Kingsley,
>
>  
>
> Thanks!
>
> I’m trying this approach but it’s not working for me somehow.
>
> I have reloaded r2rml script using Conductor UI to
> http://localhost:8890/r2rml#
>

Okay, and that should be your virtual graph.
>
> I have also checked «Create RDB2RDF Triggers» and «Enable Data Syncs
> with Physical Quad Store» options.
>

Okay, but there's no harm in running it manually using the command
presented in my reply. Basically, verify that you have virtual triples
via: sparql select count (*) from <{virtual-named-graph-iri}> and then
attempt to sync to the physical named graph, and after the sync execute:
sparql select count (*) from <{physical-named-graph-iri}> .
>
> It has executed with no errors, but when I’m trying to query
> <urn:localhost:8890:r2rml> I get nothing.
>

So its possible that script execution didn't work.

> I also don’t see this Physical graph in the list of Graphs in Conductor.
>
> However if I try querying remote graph, I get the query running
> forever (actually it’s the problem I started with).
>
>  
>
> Should I wait until Virtuoso finishes sync to Physical Quad Store?
>

Yes, if its in progress.

> Is there a way to keep track of the current progress?
>

The DB file will grow, so: ls -lt virtuoso.db, is the ultimate indicator.

> Is there a way to trigger sync to start right away?
>

Well not via r2rml, but if you manually generated RDF Views from the
r2rml you end up with a script that automates this.

> Sorry, a lot of questions.
>

BTW -- how many records are there in each of the source tables? How many
triples did you have in the virtual graph?

Kingsley
>
> Thanks for all your help in this.
>
>  
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alexander Efimov.
>
>  
>
> *From:*Kingsley Idehen [mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2015 3:51 PM
> *To:* virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Virtuoso-users] Find out which SQL query is generated
> from my SPARQL
>
>  
>
> On 12/16/15 4:33 AM, Efimov, Alexander wrote:
>
>     Hi Kingsley,
>
>      
>
>     Do you mean that if I modify the query in a following way it
>     should work without any problem?
>
>      
>
>     PREFIX:  sq:<http://our_schema> <http://our_schema>
>
>      
>
>     SELECT *
>
>     FROM  <http://this_is_the_graph_name >
>
>     WHERE
>
>     {
>
>         ?customer sq:hasOrder ?order .
>
>         ?order sq:hasGoods ?goods .
>
>         ?goods sq:Name ?goodsName . FILTER (?goodsName in (‘Name1’,
>     ‘Name2’)) .
>
>         ?goods sq:hasSubCategory ?subCategory . #note that subcategory
>     is IRI
>
>         ?subCategory sq:hasParentCategory ?category #note that
>     category is IRI
>
>     };
>
>
> It will work better (fewer costly joins re. instanceOf handling). 
> Ultimately, for massive amounts of data, you really want to implement
> the virtual->physical sync option. Then you have the ability to
> explore data with more flexibility (different rdf views for different
> purposes) and scalability (instanceOf relations, inference and
> reasoning etc..).
>
> Kingsley
>
>     Thank you.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Alexander Efimov.
>
>      
>
>     *From:*Kingsley Idehen [mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com]
>     *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 11:49 PM
>     *To:* virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Virtuoso-users] Find out which SQL query is
>     generated from my SPARQL
>
>      
>
>     On 12/14/15 11:34 AM, Efimov, Alexander wrote:
>
>         Hi Kingsley,
>
>          
>
>         The idea is that our concept model I map to with R2RML is not
>         the same as source tables.
>
>         So just  using output from Generate RDF Views would not work.
>
>         I write custom R2RML code which maps from flat DB model to
>         graph concept model
>
>          
>
>         For example:
>
>          
>
>         Let it be the following tables:
>
>          
>
>         1.       Goods
>
>         a.       ID Integer
>
>         b.      Name String
>
>         c.       Category String
>
>         d.      SubCategory String
>
>          
>
>         2.       Customer
>
>         a.       ID Integer
>
>         b.      Name String
>
>          
>
>         3.       Order
>
>         a.       ID Integer
>
>         b.      Goods ID Integer
>
>         c.       Customer ID Integer
>
>          
>
>         These three tables map to our Concept model which is a bit
>         different from table structure and I’m executing SPARQL Query
>         like this:
>
>          
>
>         PREFIX:  sq:<http://our_schema> <http://our_schema>
>
>          
>
>         SELECT *
>
>         FROM  <http://this_is_the_graph_name >
>
>         WHERE
>
>         {
>
>             ?customer sq:hasOrder ?order .
>
>             ?order sq:hasGoods ?goods .
>
>             ?goods sq:Name ?goodsName . FILTER (?goodsName in
>         (‘Name1’, ‘Name2’)) .
>
>             ?goods sq:hasSubCategory ?subCategory . #note that
>         subcategory is IRI
>
>             ?subCategory a sq:SubCategory .
>
>             ?subCategory sq:hasParentCategory ?category #note that
>         category is IRI
>
>             ?subCategory a sq:Category .
>
>         };
>
>          
>
>         In my particular case I map data from ~10 views to ~13 classes
>         in our concept model and WHERE statement is a bit longer.
>
>          
>
>
>
>     You have a number of rdf:type relations in your query which pose
>     problems unless you leverage the use of physical triples sync'd
>     with transient triples (the product of loading your r2rml mappings).
>
>     Command:
>
>     RDF_VIEW_SYNC_TO_PHYSICAL ('{virtual-triples-named-graph-iri}', 1,
>     '{physical-triples-named-graph-iri}');
>
>     Example:
>
>     Given a named-graph containing virtual triples (result of loading
>     your r2rml declarations) identified by the IRI
>     <http://demo.openlinksw.com/SQLServer#>
>     <http://demo.openlinksw.com/SQLServer>, you could make the
>     physical sync replica using a named-graph that holds physical
>     triples identified by the IRI: <urn:demo.openlinksw.com:SQLServer>
>     using the command:
>
>     RDF_VIEW_SYNC_TO_PHYSICAL ('http://demo.openlinksw.com/SQLServer#
>     <http://demo.openlinksw.com/SQLServer>', 1,
>     'urn:demo.openlinksw.com:SQLServer');
>
>     Virtuoso will keep <urn:demo.openlinksw.com:SQLServer> in sync
>     with <http://demo.openlinksw.com/SQLServer#>
>     <http://demo.openlinksw.com/SQLServer> and that named graph should
>     be the target of queries that are scoped to rdf:type relations.
>
>     Links:
>
>     [1]
>     
> http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2015/07/conceptual-data-virtualization-across.html
>
>     [2]
>     http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/fn_rdf_view_sync_to_physical.html 
>     .
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Regards,
>
>      
>
>     Kingsley Idehen       
>
>     Founder & CEO 
>
>     OpenLink Software     
>
>     Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>
>     Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
>
>     Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>     <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen>
>
>     Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
>
>     Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
>
>     LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
>     Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
>
>
>
>
>     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Virtuoso-users mailing list
>
>     Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>     <mailto:Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>  
> Kingsley Idehen       
> Founder & CEO 
> OpenLink Software     
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
> Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen>
> Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this


-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen       
Founder & CEO 
OpenLink Software     
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Virtuoso-users mailing list
Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users

Reply via email to