Hi Richard,

What is your SPARQL endpoint or preferably datasets and steps for recreating ?

Best Regards
Hugh Williams
Professional Services
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers

> On 12 Oct 2015, at 14:35, Richard Nagelmaeker <i...@bluesky.co.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We are using RDFS inference on the SPARQL end-point, but get some unexpected 
> results. 
> Is this how the endpoint is supposed to work?
> 
> In the dataset the following set of triples has been defined (turtle syntax):
> relationZ rdfs:subPropertyOf relationA, relationB
> 
> We do the following query:
> (Query 1)
> DEFINE input:inference <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# 
> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>> 
> SELECT ?a
> WHERE 
> {
> ?a a Product . 
> ?b a Mutation . 
> ?a ?p ?b . 
> }
> 
> The resultset is Empty.
> 
> If we change the query, so ?p becomes RelationA (like the example below) the 
> resultset has many responses. 
> 
> (Query 2)
> DEFINE input:inference <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# 
> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>> 
> SELECT ?a
> WHERE 
> {
> ?a a Product . 
> ?b a Mutation . 
> ?a relationA ?b . 
> }
> 
> If we turn of the inference line, by commenting it out, (Query 1) returns 
> many responses, whereas (Query 2) has an empty resultset.
> 
> Expected result:
> If (Query 1) has inference defined, it should return many responses (because 
> there is nothing to infere). Can anybody explain how this should work?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 
> -- 
> Richard Nagelmaeker
> 
> BlueSky
> Allowing data to empower humanity
> 
> Tel: +31(0)6-3424 9884
> 
> KvK: 63442221 
> 
> On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 16:05 +0000, 
> virtuoso-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
>> 
>> Send Virtuoso-users mailing list submissions to
>>      virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> 
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users 
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users>
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>      virtuoso-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:virtuoso-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>      virtuoso-users-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:virtuoso-users-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Virtuoso-users digest..."
>> Today's Topics:
>> 
>>    1. quick exact label search through all languages (J?rn Hees)
>>    2. Re: quick exact label search through all languages
>>       (Patrick van Kleef)
>>    3. Re: quick exact label search through all languages (J?rn Hees)
>>    4. RDF Mapper Options in Conductor (Haag, Jason)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Virtuoso-users mailing list
>> Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users 
>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Virtuoso-users mailing list
> Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Virtuoso-users mailing list
Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users

Reply via email to