Hi Sebastian,

I see what you mean by the difference in request types:

v71:

<rdf:RDF xmlns:res="http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results#"; 
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";>

v6.1:

<sparql xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results#"; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/result2.xsd";>

and I can't see how the request types can be changed in isparql, so will have 
to check with development to see if/how this can be done and why the change was 
made ...

Best Regards
Hugh Williams
Professional Services
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers

On 7 May 2014, at 17:13, Sebastian Straub <sstr...@avantgarde-labs.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I tried to install Virtuoso 7.1 (stable) on Ubuntu 14.04, but due to
> issue #160 [1], I had to switch to the development-branch, which
> compiled without any errors.
> 
> Now, when I run SPARQL queries via HTTP or the basic sparql
> webinterface, everything works as expected, but when using isparql, I'm
> getting strange results.
> 
> For example, isparql expands the default Concepts-query to
> 
> """
> maxrows=50
> query=
> SELECT DISTINCT ?Concept
> WHERE {
>  [] rdf:type ?Concept .
> }
> 
> format=application/rdf+xml
> """
> 
> which, on 7.1 stable, would return a document of content type
> application/sparql-results+xml (even though application/rdf+xml is
> requested).
> 
> on the development branch (Version: 07.10.3208, Build: May 7 2014)
> however, the same query does actually return a document of type
> application/rdf+xml, which does not seem to be expected by isparql,
> therefore causing these strange results.
> 
> So, am I right with my assumption? Can I configure isparql to request
> application/sparql-results+xml?
> 
> Best regards
> Sebastian
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource/issues/160
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sebastian Straub
> Avantgarde Labs GmbH
> www.avantgarde-labs.de
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
> &#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
> &#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
> &#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
> _______________________________________________
> Virtuoso-users mailing list
> Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Virtuoso-users mailing list
Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users

Reply via email to