Hi Ivan, Thank you for implementing graph groups support for inference schemas.
You said "then add your TBox and ABox graphs to that group", but I see no sense to add ABox to schema as Virtuoso doesn't support any OWL features that mix TBox and ABox (for example, oneOf restriction). Regards, Alexander 2010/2/25 Ivan Mikhailov <imikhai...@openlinksw.com> > Hello Alexander, > > As proven by studying the code, the support of multiple schema graphs > become seriously incomplete as inference was extended more and more. > Even worse, an attempt to extend it "mechanically" to coven new > inference features would cause slow loading of big rule sets in big > databases. > > As a consequence, I've rewritten the rule set loader in such a way that > it loads ontology data faster and it can load from graph groups, not > only from plain graph. So it will be possible to create a graph group as > described in > > http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/rdfgraphsecurity.html#rdfgraphsecuritygroups > then add your TBox and ABox graphs to that group and use a single > procedure call to load the whole graph group. > > The fix is in the internal CVS and will appear in the nearest snapshot > or release of VOS. > > Best Regards, > > Ivan Mikhailov > OpenLink Software > http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com > > On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 09:55 +0100, Alexander Sidorov wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Documentation says "It is possible to combine multiple schema graphs > > into a single rule set", but how to implement this? If I try to use > > rdfs_rule_set with one name but different graphs only the last one is > > used. Also I tried to create graph group and rdfs_rule_set to it, but > > it didn't work too. > > > > What I really need is to split TBox and ABox into different graphs to > > be able "clear and upload" new TBox when I need. > > > > Regards, > > Alexander > > >
