Re: [Virtuoso-users] ORDER BY problem

[Ted Thibodeau Jr]

Hi, Sergejs --

On Mar 17, 2009, at 06:30 AM, Sergejs Rikacovs wrote:
Noticed one  strange thing while executing SPARQL queries on  
Virtuoso( Version 05.09.3037 Build: Feb 13 2009)
through Virtuoso Sparql Query Form.

I have two queries( the only difference between them is the absence  
of the order by clause in the second query ) :

select distinct ?assocUri {?assocUri <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type 
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty>. } ORDER BY  ? 
assocUri

This query returns following data:

[snip]


The second query:

select distinct ?assocUri {?assocUri <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type 
> <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty>. }

This query returns :

[snip]


So If I have the order by clause in my query I get literals instead  
of URI`s, and If I do not have order by clause I recieve URIs, as I  
would expect.

Could I ask you to give some comments on this ?



Thanks for flagging this.

We have reproduced the issue, and it is scheduled for patching in the  
near
future.  I'm sorry but I cannot provide a firmer ETA for you at this  
time.

Regards,

Ted




--
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibod...@openlinksw.com
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
                                 http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
                               http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers