Hi Jorgen,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on char-misc/char-misc-testing]
[also build test WARNING on linux/master linus/master v5.17-rc2 next-20220202]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jorgen-Hansen/VMCI-dma-dg-Add-support-for-DMA-datagrams/20220202-230034
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git 
7ab004dbcbee38b8a70798835d3ffcd97a985a5e
config: i386-randconfig-s002 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220203/[email protected]/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.4-dirty
        # 
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/a5ca330527cc5a2ed5eba621707076ab15d856e5
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
Jorgen-Hansen/VMCI-dma-dg-Add-support-for-DMA-datagrams/20220202-230034
        git checkout a5ca330527cc5a2ed5eba621707076ab15d856e5
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir 
ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:105:45: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in 
argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void const volatile 
[noderef] __iomem *addr @@     got char * @@
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:105:45: sparse:     expected void const 
volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:105:45: sparse:     got char *
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:102:14: sparse: sparse: symbol 
'vmci_read_reg' was not declared. Should it be static?
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:112:44: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in 
argument 2 (different address spaces) @@     expected void volatile [noderef] 
__iomem *addr @@     got char * @@
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:112:44: sparse:     expected void 
volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:112:44: sparse:     got char *
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:109:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 
'vmci_write_reg' was not declared. Should it be static?
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:514:27: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in 
assignment (different address spaces) @@     expected char *mmio_base @@     
got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:514:27: sparse:     expected char 
*mmio_base
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:514:27: sparse:     got void [noderef] 
__iomem *
>> drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:869:43: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in 
>> argument 2 (different address spaces) @@     expected void [noderef] __iomem 
>> * @@     got char *mmio_base @@
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:869:43: sparse:     expected void 
[noderef] __iomem *
   drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:869:43: sparse:     got char *mmio_base

vim +869 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c

   813  
   814  static void vmci_guest_remove_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
   815  {
   816          struct vmci_guest_device *vmci_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
   817          int vmci_err;
   818  
   819          dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Removing device\n");
   820  
   821          atomic_dec(&vmci_num_guest_devices);
   822  
   823          vmci_qp_guest_endpoints_exit();
   824  
   825          vmci_err = vmci_event_unsubscribe(ctx_update_sub_id);
   826          if (vmci_err < VMCI_SUCCESS)
   827                  dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
   828                           "Failed to unsubscribe from event (type=%d) 
with subscriber (ID=0x%x): %d\n",
   829                           VMCI_EVENT_CTX_ID_UPDATE, ctx_update_sub_id, 
vmci_err);
   830  
   831          spin_lock_irq(&vmci_dev_spinlock);
   832          vmci_dev_g = NULL;
   833          vmci_pdev = NULL;
   834          spin_unlock_irq(&vmci_dev_spinlock);
   835  
   836          dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Resetting vmci device\n");
   837          vmci_write_reg(vmci_dev, VMCI_CONTROL_RESET, VMCI_CONTROL_ADDR);
   838  
   839          /*
   840           * Free IRQ and then disable MSI/MSI-X as appropriate.  For
   841           * MSI-X, we might have multiple vectors, each with their own
   842           * IRQ, which we must free too.
   843           */
   844          if (vmci_dev->exclusive_vectors) {
   845                  free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 1), vmci_dev);
   846                  if (vmci_dev->mmio_base != NULL)
   847                          free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 2), vmci_dev);
   848          }
   849          free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0), vmci_dev);
   850          pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
   851  
   852          tasklet_kill(&vmci_dev->datagram_tasklet);
   853          tasklet_kill(&vmci_dev->bm_tasklet);
   854  
   855          if (vmci_dev->notification_bitmap) {
   856                  /*
   857                   * The device reset above cleared the bitmap state of 
the
   858                   * device, so we can safely free it here.
   859                   */
   860  
   861                  dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, PAGE_SIZE,
   862                                    vmci_dev->notification_bitmap,
   863                                    vmci_dev->notification_base);
   864          }
   865  
   866          vmci_free_dg_buffers(vmci_dev);
   867  
   868          if (vmci_dev->mmio_base != NULL)
 > 869                  pci_iounmap(pdev, vmci_dev->mmio_base);
   870  
   871          /* The rest are managed resources and will be freed by PCI core 
*/
   872  }
   873  

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to