On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 07:09:00PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> hwrng core uses two buffers that can be mixed in the
> virtio-rng queue.
> 
> If the buffer is provided with wait=0 it is enqueued in the
> virtio-rng queue but unused by the caller.
> On the next call, core provides another buffer but the
> first one is filled instead and the new one queued.
> And the caller reads the data from the new one that is not
> updated, and the data in the first one are lost.
> 
> To avoid this mix, virtio-rng needs to use its own unique
> internal buffer at a cost of a data copy to the caller buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c 
> b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> index a90001e02bf7..208c547dcac1 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> @@ -18,13 +18,20 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(rng_index_ida);
>  struct virtrng_info {
>       struct hwrng hwrng;
>       struct virtqueue *vq;
> -     struct completion have_data;
>       char name[25];
> -     unsigned int data_avail;
>       int index;
>       bool busy;
>       bool hwrng_register_done;
>       bool hwrng_removed;
> +     /* data transfer */
> +     struct completion have_data;
> +     unsigned int data_avail;
> +     /* minimal size returned by rng_buffer_size() */
> +#if SMP_CACHE_BYTES < 32
> +     u8 data[32];
> +#else
> +     u8 data[SMP_CACHE_BYTES];
> +#endif

Let's move this logic to a macro in hw_random.h ?

>  };
>  
>  static void random_recv_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> @@ -39,14 +46,14 @@ static void random_recv_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
>  }
>  
>  /* The host will fill any buffer we give it with sweet, sweet randomness. */
> -static void register_buffer(struct virtrng_info *vi, u8 *buf, size_t size)
> +static void register_buffer(struct virtrng_info *vi)
>  {
>       struct scatterlist sg;
>  
> -     sg_init_one(&sg, buf, size);
> +     sg_init_one(&sg, vi->data, sizeof(vi->data));

Note that add_early_randomness requests less:
        size_t size = min_t(size_t, 16, rng_buffer_size());

maybe track how much was requested and grow up to sizeof(data)?

>  
>       /* There should always be room for one buffer. */
> -     virtqueue_add_inbuf(vi->vq, &sg, 1, buf, GFP_KERNEL);
> +     virtqueue_add_inbuf(vi->vq, &sg, 1, vi->data, GFP_KERNEL);


BTW no longer true if DMA API is in use ... not easy to fix,
I think some changes to virtio API to allow pre-mapping
s/g for DMA might be needed ...

>  
>       virtqueue_kick(vi->vq);
>  }
> @@ -55,6 +62,8 @@ static int virtio_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t 
> size, bool wait)
>  {
>       int ret;
>       struct virtrng_info *vi = (struct virtrng_info *)rng->priv;
> +     unsigned int chunk;
> +     size_t read;
>  
>       if (vi->hwrng_removed)
>               return -ENODEV;
> @@ -62,19 +71,33 @@ static int virtio_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, 
> size_t size, bool wait)
>       if (!vi->busy) {
>               vi->busy = true;
>               reinit_completion(&vi->have_data);
> -             register_buffer(vi, buf, size);
> +             register_buffer(vi);
>       }
>  
>       if (!wait)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     ret = wait_for_completion_killable(&vi->have_data);
> -     if (ret < 0)
> -             return ret;
> +     read = 0;
> +     while (size != 0) {
> +             ret = wait_for_completion_killable(&vi->have_data);
> +             if (ret < 0)
> +                     return ret;
> +
> +             chunk = min_t(unsigned int, size, vi->data_avail);
> +             memcpy(buf + read, vi->data, chunk);
> +             read += chunk;
> +             size -= chunk;
> +             vi->data_avail = 0;
> +
> +             if (size != 0) {
> +                     reinit_completion(&vi->have_data);
> +                     register_buffer(vi);
> +             }
> +     }
>  
>       vi->busy = false;
>  
> -     return vi->data_avail;
> +     return read;
>  }
>  
>  static void virtio_cleanup(struct hwrng *rng)
> -- 
> 2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to