On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:30 PM Christian Brabandt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Do, 29 Aug 2019, Marius Gedminas wrote: > > > (I like the [N/M] index, but I also think the W is way too subtle, and I > > find myself looping again and again.) > > When the N/M index was first introduced, it did show the error message > and forced a small delay to make sure it can be read before the N/M > index would potentially overwrite it. However people complained about > vim being unresponsive, so it was changed and the 'W' indicator was > added as a compromise. > > Best, > Christian
Ah, that was it. Thanks Christian and Marius. Best regards, Tony. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/CAJkCKXsGHx7E%3DGR4MbExGMiHtTLDWrjhEWsPiPXCdLf-uM3bbQ%40mail.gmail.com.
