On 2018-11-05 10:36, Matt Ackeret wrote: > dumb suggestion on my part - use a hard link instead of a soft link?
Neither hard- nor sym- link makes a difference. At least in the case of the symlink, vim has a hope of knowing where the destination directory is, whereas with a hard link, it would have to scavenge the file-system for other directories containing the same inode#. That said, I tend to default to symlinks unless I have a compelling reason to do otherwise. Fewer surprises when things cross file-system boundaries. -tim -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
