patch 9.1.1033: Vim9: compiling abstract method fails without return
Commit:
https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/7c92e888946903fa26b377efbc98c8f83e9188b8
Author: Ernie Rael <err...@raelity.com>
Date: Sat Jan 18 17:26:39 2025 +0100
patch 9.1.1033: Vim9: compiling abstract method fails without return
Problem: Vim9: compiling abstract method fails without return
(Aliaksei Budavei)
Solution: don't require return for an abstract method
(Ernie Rael)
fixes: #15432
related: ##15441
closes: #16469
Signed-off-by: Ernie Rael <err...@raelity.com>
Signed-off-by: Yegappan Lakshmanan <yegap...@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <c...@256bit.org>
diff --git a/src/testdir/test_vim9_class.vim b/src/testdir/test_vim9_class.vim
index fc0edeb5b..cac8b63c7 100644
--- a/src/testdir/test_vim9_class.vim
+++ b/src/testdir/test_vim9_class.vim
@@ -6458,6 +6458,39 @@ def Test_abstract_method()
assert_equal('foo', A.Foo())
END
v9.CheckSourceSuccess(lines)
+
+ # Invoke method returning a value through the abstract class. See #15432.
+ lines =<< trim END
+ vim9script
+
+ abstract class A
+ abstract def String(): string
+ endclass
+
+ class B extends A
+ def String(): string
+ return 'B'
+ enddef
+ endclass
+
+ def F(o: A)
+ assert_equal('B', o.String())
+ enddef
+ F(B.new())
+ END
+ v9.CheckSourceSuccess(lines)
+
+ # Invoke abstract method returning a value does not compile
+ lines =<< trim END
+ vim9script
+
+ abstract class A
+ abstract def String(): string
+ return 'X'
+ enddef
+ endclass
+ END
+ v9.CheckScriptFailure(lines, "E1318: Not a valid command in a class: return
'X'")
enddef
" Test for calling a class method from a subclass
diff --git a/src/version.c b/src/version.c
index 6e6b651a1..ba4115977 100644
--- a/src/version.c
+++ b/src/version.c
@@ -704,6 +704,8 @@ static char *(features[]) =
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+ 1034,
/**/
1033,
/**/
diff --git a/src/vim9compile.c b/src/vim9compile.c
index fa02871e8..338415e85 100644
--- a/src/vim9compile.c
+++ b/src/vim9compile.c
@@ -4917,9 +4917,10 @@ compile_def_function(
goto erret;
ufunc->uf_args_visible = ufunc->uf_args.ga_len;
- // Compiling a function in an interface is done to get the function type.
- // No code is actually compiled.
- if (ufunc->uf_class != NULL && IS_INTERFACE(ufunc->uf_class))
+ // Compiling an abstract method or a function in an interface is done to
+ // get the function type. No code is actually compiled.
+ if (ufunc->uf_class != NULL && (IS_INTERFACE(ufunc->uf_class)
+ || IS_ABSTRACT_METHOD(ufunc)))
{
ufunc->uf_def_status = UF_NOT_COMPILED;
ret = OK;
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/E1tZBi0-0036Yf-TF%40256bit.org.
