On Sun, 2024-07-07 at 18:53 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Thanks for the clear analysis. Apparently in tiny mode, we don't need to > get a new allocated pointer to the buffer line and then changing the > line does not invalidate the cached text length. I have now created > https://github.com/vim/vim/pull/15178 as a fix.
Thanks, that'd have taken me a while :) That patch seems to work. -Rob -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/489543d080d45bd16fb9ea87d74aa9f41815398f.camel%40loonybin.net.
