valhalla-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8365989: [lworld] Un-ProblemList MemoryAccessProviderTest.java and TestHotSpotResolvedJavaField.java Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8365989: [lworld] Un-ProblemList MemoryAccessProviderTest.java and TestHotSpotResolvedJavaField.java Tobias Hartmann
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372700: [lworld] compiler/c2/irTests/stable/* fail with --enable-preview [v4] Marc Chevalier
• RFR: Improving pattern handling for non-null types Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: Improving pattern handling for non-null types Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Improving pattern handling for non-null types Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: Improving pattern handling for non-null types duke
  • Re: RFR: Improving pattern handling for non-null types Jan Lahoda
  • Integrated: Improving pattern handling for non-null types Jan Lahoda
• [lworld] Integrated: 8372700: [lworld] compiler/c2/irTests/stable/* fail with --enable-preview Marc Chevalier
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372700: [lworld] compiler/c2/irTests/stable/* fail with --enable-preview [v6] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372700: [lworld] compiler/c2/irTests/stable/* fail with --enable-preview [v6] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372700: [lworld] compiler/c2/irTests/stable/* fail with --enable-preview [v6] Marc Chevalier
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372700: [lworld] compiler/c2/irTests/stable/* fail with --enable-preview [v5] Marc Chevalier
• RFR: 8375223: Add proper toString output to bfloat16 implementation Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: 8375223: Add proper toString output to bfloat16 implementation Joe Darcy
• [lworld] RFR: 8375087: [lworld] ProblemList java/util/Collection/MOAT.java Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375087: [lworld] ProblemList java/util/Collection/MOAT.java Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375087: [lworld] ProblemList java/util/Collection/MOAT.java Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8375087: [lworld] ProblemList java/util/Collection/MOAT.java Daniel D . Daugherty
• RFR: Add NULL_CHECKED flag to array creation calls Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: Add NULL_CHECKED flag to array creation calls Maurizio Cimadamore
• RFR: 8356104: Add bfloat16 implementation for testing purposes Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: 8356104: Add bfloat16 implementation for testing purposes Joe Darcy
• RFR: Tweak error when a null-restricted field is missing an initializer Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Tweak error when a null-restricted field is missing an initializer Vicente Romero
  • Integrated: Tweak error when a null-restricted field is missing an initializer Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] Integrated: 8373930: [lworld] Restore Objects.equals use of identity check Roger Riggs
• type classes prototype Maurizio Cimadamore
• RFR: Initial push for type classes support Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: Initial push for type classes support Maurizio Cimadamore
• RFR: 8375139: [lworld] Disable jcheck in "type-classes" branch David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8375139: [lworld] Disable jcheck in "type-classes" branch Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: 8375139: [lworld] Disable jcheck in "type-classes" branch David Simms
• [lworld] RFR: 8374116: [lworld] TestIntrinsics::test82 fails post JDK-8372634 Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374116: [lworld] TestIntrinsics::test82 fails post JDK-8372634 Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374116: [lworld] TestIntrinsics::test82 fails post JDK-8372634 Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374116: [lworld] TestIntrinsics::test82 fails post JDK-8372634 Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374116: [lworld] TestIntrinsics::test82 fails post JDK-8372634 Marc Chevalier
• RFR: Attribution not setting strict array creation flag Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: Attribution not setting strict array creation flag Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Attribution not setting strict array creation flag Vicente Romero
• [lworld] RFR: 8373982: [lworld] Verification code in InlineTypeNode::has_phi_inputs does not check all field values Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373982: [lworld] Verification code in InlineTypeNode::has_phi_inputs does not check all field values Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373982: [lworld] Verification code in InlineTypeNode::has_phi_inputs does not check all field values Marc Chevalier
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8373982: [lworld] Verification code in InlineTypeNode::has_phi_inputs does not check all field values Marc Chevalier
• [valhalla-docs] Integrated: site/_index.md: Fix JEP 401 link Christopher Sahnwaldt
• [lworld] RFR: 8375064: [lworld] ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java on windows-x64 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375064: [lworld] ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java on windows-x64 Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375064: [lworld] ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java on windows-x64 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8375064: [lworld] ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/exclude/exclude001/exclude001.java on windows-x64 Daniel D . Daugherty
• [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects [v5] Chris Plummer
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
• RFR: Fix nullability signature attr tests Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: Fix nullability signature attr tests Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: Fix nullability signature attr tests Vicente Romero
• [lworld] RFR: 8372723: [lworld] Un-problem list TestVerifyGraphEdges.java Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372723: [lworld] Un-problem list TestVerifyGraphEdges.java Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372723: [lworld] Un-problem list TestVerifyGraphEdges.java Marc Chevalier
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8372723: [lworld] Un-problem list TestVerifyGraphEdges.java Marc Chevalier
• RFR: do not generate null checks for record patterns Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: do not generate null checks for record patterns Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: do not generate null checks for record patterns [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: do not generate null checks for record patterns [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: do not generate null checks for record patterns [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: do not generate null checks for record patterns [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: do not generate null checks for record patterns [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Withdrawn: do not generate null checks for record patterns Vicente Romero
• RFR: fixing bugs in NullChecksWriter Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bugs in NullChecksWriter Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: fixing bugs in NullChecksWriter [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bugs in NullChecksWriter [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bugs in NullChecksWriter [v4] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bugs in NullChecksWriter [v4] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bugs in NullChecksWriter [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: fixing bugs in NullChecksWriter Vicente Romero
• [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v2] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v2] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v3] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v4] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v5] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v6] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v7] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v8] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v8] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v8] Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v8] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode [v8] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374947: [lworld] ProblemList serviceability/sa/ClhsdbTestAllocationMerge.java in Xcomp mode Daniel D . Daugherty
• RFR: generate null checks for intersections for which at least one component is null restricted Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: generate null checks for intersections for which at least one component is null restricted Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: generate null checks for intersections for which at least one component is null restricted Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: generate null checks for intersections for which at least one component is null restricted Vicente Romero
• Re: [valhalla-docs] RFR: site/_index.md: Fix JEP 401 link Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8374913: [lworld] UnProblemList three tests due to JDK-8372341 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374913: [lworld] UnProblemList three tests due to JDK-8372341 Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374913: [lworld] UnProblemList three tests due to JDK-8372341 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374913: [lworld] UnProblemList three tests due to JDK-8372341 Daniel D . Daugherty
• RFR: Updated ArrayCreation factories and bootstraps Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: Updated ArrayCreation factories and bootstraps Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: Updated ArrayCreation factories and bootstraps Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Updated ArrayCreation factories and bootstraps Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: Updated ArrayCreation factories and bootstraps Dan Smith
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373930: [lworld] Restore Objects.equals use of identity check [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373930: [lworld] Restore Objects.equals use of identity check [v2] Ryan Hallock
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373930: [lworld] Restore Objects.equals use of identity check [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373930: [lworld] Restore Objects.equals use of identity check [v2] Chen Liang
• RFR: Drop RuntimeType Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Drop RuntimeType Vicente Romero
  • Integrated: Drop RuntimeType Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v3] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374800: [lworld] Add a NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Frederic Parain
• RFR: Add alternate desugaring strategy for null-restricted arrays Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Add alternate desugaring strategy for null-restricted arrays Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Add alternate desugaring strategy for null-restricted arrays [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Add alternate desugaring strategy for null-restricted arrays [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: Add alternate desugaring strategy for null-restricted arrays [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Add alternate desugaring strategy for null-restricted arrays [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: Add alternate desugaring strategy for null-restricted arrays [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Integrated: Add alternate desugaring strategy for null-restricted arrays Maurizio Cimadamore
• RFR: Generate missing null checks Vicente Romero

• Earlier messages
• Later messages