valhalla-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes [v3] Paul Hübner
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes Paul Hübner
• [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v3] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] duke
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout Joel Sikström
• RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v4] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt Joe Darcy
• RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v4] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v4] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v4] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v5] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v6] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v7] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v7] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v8] Vicente Romero
  • Integrated: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation Vicente Romero
• [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Casper Norrbin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Casper Norrbin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla [v2] duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Casper Norrbin
• [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids [v2] David Simms
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids [v2] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8376512: [lworld] Value objects should consistently use System.identityHashCode Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376512: [lworld] Value objects should consistently use System.identityHashCode Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376512: [lworld] Value objects should consistently use System.identityHashCode Roger Riggs
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376512: [lworld] Value objects should consistently use System.identityHashCode Roger Riggs
• [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files David Beaumont
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files [v2] David Beaumont
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files [v2] duke
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files [v2] Roger Riggs
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files David Beaumont
• [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
• [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
• [lworld] RFR: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Christian Hagedorn
• RFR: [Type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution Danish Nawab
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution [v2] Danish Nawab
  • Integrated: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY [v3] Joe Darcy
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8375574: [lworld] tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with CURRENT_PREVIEW_FEATURES Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375574: [lworld] tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with CURRENT_PREVIEW_FEATURES Vicente Romero
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8375574: [lworld] tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with CURRENT_PREVIEW_FEATURES Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375574: [lworld] tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with CURRENT_PREVIEW_FEATURES Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP [v2] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP Chen Liang
• RFR: 8376250: Upgrade Bfloat16 to use operators Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8376250: Upgrade Bfloat16 to use operators [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: [type-classes] 8376250: Upgrade Bfloat16 to use operators Joe Darcy
• [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Serguei Spitsyn
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Alex Menkov
• [lworld] Integrated: 8376411: [lworld] [BACKOUT] JDK-8376088 [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8376411: [lworld] [BACKOUT] JDK-8376088 [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8376411: [lworld] [BACKOUT] JDK-8376088 [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376411: [lworld] [BACKOUT] JDK-8376088 [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Daniel D . Daugherty
• Integrated: Removing commented tests Vicente Romero
  • Integrated: Removing commented tests Vicente Romero
• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Matias Saavedra Silva
• [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Dan Heidinga
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting [v2] Dan Heidinga
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Matias Saavedra Silva
• RFR: fixing bug in null checks generation Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bug in null checks generation [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bug in null checks generation [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: fixing bug in null checks generation Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bug in null checks generation [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bug in null checks generation [v4] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bug in null checks generation [v5] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: fixing bug in null checks generation [v5] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: fixing bug in null checks generation [v5] Vicente Romero
  • Integrated: fixing bug in null checks generation Vicente Romero
• [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v3] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v3] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v5] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v4] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v5] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v5] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v5] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v5] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v5] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v6] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v7] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v8] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v8] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v8] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v8] Quan Anh Mai
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376135: [lworld] Add JIT support for NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Quan Anh Mai
• [lworld] RFR: 8376122: [lworld] Cleanup of SA use of aconst_init and withfield Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376122: [lworld] Cleanup of SA use of aconst_init and withfield Lois Foltan
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376122: [lworld] Cleanup of SA use of aconst_init and withfield Frederic Parain
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376122: [lworld] Cleanup of SA use of aconst_init and withfield Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376122: [lworld] Cleanup of SA use of aconst_init and withfield Paul Hübner
• RFR: [type-classes]: Lowered code for operator for type class operators is missing a cast Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: [type-classes]: Lowered code for operator for type class operators is missing a cast Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] Integrated: 8376292: [lworld] compiler/ciReplay/TestValueClassArrays.java should not run with additional VM flags Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8376292: [lworld] compiler/ciReplay/TestValueClassArrays.java should not run with additional VM flags Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8376292: [lworld] compiler/ciReplay/TestValueClassArrays.java should not run with additional VM flags Christian Hagedorn
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376292: [lworld] compiler/ciReplay/TestValueClassArrays.java should not run with additional VM flags Christian Hagedorn
• [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses [v4] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses [v5] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses [v5] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses [v4] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses [v4] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses [v5] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376221: [lworld] Do not store array of InlineLayoutInfo for all InstanceKlasses [v2] Joel Sikström

• Earlier messages
• Later messages