Yes, setting it to 0 works the same as commenting out that line. Thanks! On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Igor Katson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, Roberto, I will try to check when the service can afford some > downtime, during the night in Russia. > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Roberto De Ioris <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> The version is 2.0.8, strace looks something like this: >> >> .. >> >> nanosleep({0, 204800000}, NULL) >> >> .... >> >> nanosleep({0, 819200000}, NULL) >> >> .... >> >> nanosleep({0, 409600000}, NULL) >> >> >> >> >> >> Commenting out that line helped, yes! >> > >> > >> > The values are really high, maybe something in the computation is wrong. >> > >> > I will investigate on this right now and i will post a solution >> > >> > >> >> It looks like setting emperor-throttle to 0 will disable the usleep() >> call. I will wait for your confirmation so i can add it to emperor docs >> >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Roberto De Ioris >> http://unbit.it >> _______________________________________________ >> uWSGI mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi >> > >
_______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
