> Hello!
>
> I am using uwsgi-1.9.10 on FreeBSD.
>
> My uwsgi.ini is the following:
> [uwsgi]
> buffer-size = 65535
> carbon = w.x.y.z:2003
> carbon-id = xxx
> carbon-no-workers = true
> chdir = /var/chroot/uwsgi
> enable-threads = true
> harakiri = 10
> harakiri-verbose = true
> listen = 1024
> master = true
> max-requests = 10000
> module = frontend.wsgi
> no-orphans = true
> processes = 32
> vacuum = true
>
> uwsgi is running on 16-core CPU machine and usual LA is ~3.
> These 32 processes is enough to process all the incoming requests (more
> that enough actually).
>
> Now I bump 'processes' parameter to, say, 128.  The incoming request rate
> does not change, so I assume that
> these 128 workers will process request as 32 processes did, just each
> worker will receive 4 times less requests and will sleep more waiting for
> next request.
>
> But what I see is that LA on that machine raise to 30 (up from 3), and CPU
> time raise from ~15%user+5%system to
> 40% user + 30% system.
>
> Why??
>
> In similar scenario when running Apache in pre-fork mode it does not
> matter how much MinSpareServers I have (1 or 100),
> CPU time is utilized equally.  Why is it not the case with uwsgi?
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
> _______________________________________________
> uWSGI mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
>

Best candidate could be your server swapping out as 128 uwsgi processes
can consume a huge amount of ram.

Less common could be thundering herd
(http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/articles/SerializingAccept.html)
but on virtualized kernels and sysvipc locking i have received some report
in the past.

-- 
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

Reply via email to