How about to use memcache on the same host to share data between processes?
Andriy ________________________________ > From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:57:30 -0700 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [uWSGI] sharing objects amongst workers > > We are using the pymongo driver with mongodb and as it stands, it looks > like each worker gets its own connection. Is there any way to share a > database connection in memory among the workers? I've read about ksm > on the readthedocs page, is that applicable here? > > We also have a bunch of python objects being stored in memory, would > KSM be helpful in sharing memory among the workers for this? > > For example: > Currently we have an identical list being stored on each worker (we > keep the list stored in a python variable because its large and we need > to access it quickly so storing in the uwsgi cache and pickling and > unpickling (the only way I can think of to store a python object in the > cache) each request, would be too slow) and we have 6 workers. This > means we are using several times the memory we actually need to. Is > there any way to share a global python object among all of the workers? > All we do is read from it, we only modify it when we are completely > refreshing it periodically. > > The overarching question is, how do i share db connections and python > objects globally, so each worker doesn't need to have their own copy of > the python objects and we aren't keeping so many db connections open? > > _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi > _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
