> If so maybe it's slight inconvenience - only string params - but never > mind > in case of param structure a la JSON. > > I like that type-rich approach described by Aarni's in example ( > https://gist.github.com/akx/5585146) is also possible. > > Tom
Using the word "string" in the whole uWSGI RPC context has been an unfortunate choice. The right term would be "blob", as the whole system is supposed to be "interpreted" by convention. The example you posted is exactly what i mean. Another example could be: '3' is a "string" representation for 3 and so on... The uWSGI RPC subsystem is meant for fast distribution of requests in clusters, that's why it is so raw, but you can build abstractions over it -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
