+1

Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire
Jon McAlexander | Senior Infrastructure Engineer | Middleware/App Hosting | FHP 
| CTO | Wells Fargo Technology
8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322 MAC: F4469-010  | +1 515 988 2508 | 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Need to engage our teams?  Click here:
https://hop.cfapps.wellsfargo.net/mwae

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not 
use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any 
information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise 
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for 
your cooperation.

From: William Crowell <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 3:59 AM
To: Tomcat Users List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: HTTP/3 (QUIC) support




My apologies I forgot to add:



 I think it would be better for now if HTTP/3 is required is to front Tomcat 
with NGINX as a reverse proxy.



From: William Crowell 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 at 4:58 AM

To: Tomcat Users List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Subject: Re: HTTP/3 (QUIC) support

Hi, I asked the same question back in April, and here was the combined response 
I got from Mark Thomas, Chris Schultz, and Rémy Maucherat:



https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/l4f9f47hzytr28wvgw1fvl2k2gnplx4j__;!!F9svGWnIaVPGSwU!ozwxodxoNDTqlqqk5hewOZxJBGVSvsK80Tm8tGMolNNpt26GR06ZmCSEr03b9-fYfWyWYoRD3qBD_lLi5esXtj-Byhrlih8BmA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.apache.org/thread/l4f9f47hzytr28wvgw1fvl2k2gnplx4j__;!!F9svGWnIaVPGSwU!ozwxodxoNDTqlqqk5hewOZxJBGVSvsK80Tm8tGMolNNpt26GR06ZmCSEr03b9-fYfWyWYoRD3qBD_lLi5esXtj-Byhrlih8BmA$>



“The QUIC plans have been on and off.  Currently more off than on. If we were 
to implement today, it would probably be with panama and a native QUIC stack.



HTTP/3 runs over QUIC.  It is a bit of a simplification but QUIC (and therefore 
HTTP/3) essentially trades increased CPU usage at the client/server for better 
tolerance of poor networks.



Tomcat is not normally directly internet facing. It is typically sat behind 
some form of load-balancer and/or TLS termination and/or reverse proxy. In 
those scenarios poor network conditions aren't an issue so using QUIC is costs 
CPU power which is something folks - particularly those with large 
installations - try to minimize. It makes more sense to use HTTP/1.1 in those 
scenarios.



Hence there isn't much requirement for an HTTP/3 implementation in Tomcat at 
the moment.”



Regards,



William Crowell



From: Jee仔 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 at 4:45 AM

To: users <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Subject: HTTP/3 (QUIC) support

[You don't often get email from 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Learn why this is 
important at 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification__;!!F9svGWnIaVPGSwU!ozwxodxoNDTqlqqk5hewOZxJBGVSvsK80Tm8tGMolNNpt26GR06ZmCSEr03b9-fYfWyWYoRD3qBD_lLi5esXtj-ByhqqKrKUlg$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification__;!!F9svGWnIaVPGSwU!ozwxodxoNDTqlqqk5hewOZxJBGVSvsK80Tm8tGMolNNpt26GR06ZmCSEr03b9-fYfWyWYoRD3qBD_lLi5esXtj-ByhqqKrKUlg$>
 ]



Dear Apache Tomcat Team,

I hope this message finds you well. I'm currently exploring HTTP/3 integration 
possibilities and noticed that Tomcat doesn't yet natively support this 
protocol. Could you kindly share if there are any plans to implement HTTP/3 
(QUIC) support in future releases? If so, would you mind providing an estimated 
timeline?

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards





Jee仔

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>







&nbsp;





CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe.





This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments 
and notify us immediately.





This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments 
and notify us immediately.


Reply via email to