On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 2:46 PM Bo Berglund <bo.bergl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Follow-up: > > 1) I did a manual run with the command including --steal-lock and it showed > there was a stale lock that it could take over and perform the update. > So this seems to be the way to do it. Stealing locks should *not* be done by default. > 2) I have now added this into the scheduled task script on the server which > will > run about 12 hours from now, hopefully there will not be any problems then. > I made a dummy change and committed it. It should now work with the scheduled svnsync, unless you've something quite odd breaking your lock setups. > So tomorrow morning I will see if the backup is synced to reflect this. > > > -- > Bo Berglund > Developer in Sweden >
