Thorsten Schöning wrote on Tue, 19 May 2020 08:38 +0200: > Guten Tag Lorenz, > am Dienstag, 19. Mai 2020 um 07:22 schrieben Sie: > > > You first example looks exactly for the HEAD revision of the > > repository. If you path was not touched by this revision, there is no > > log regarding this path and revision to return. > > Thanks, that explanation made things more clear to me. That means that > simply using HEAD for arbitrary paths to not need to deal with THEIR > concrete revision numbers is a wrong assumption at all, isn' it? > > COMMITTED seems to be the better choice, correct? That provides > results for all paths I tested.
That would depend on what log message(s) you're trying to fetch, which you haven't told us.
