On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 01:10:25AM +0300, Anton Shepelev wrote: > Daniel Shahaf: > > However, I can also see circumstances in which this smartness > > could be counter-productive: > > > > 1. In repository restructurings, such as running «svn merge» in a > > working copy of ^/thebarproject/trunk after that project had been > > renamed from ^/thefooproject/trunk. Under the proposal, that > > would attempt to merge from ^/thefooproject/trunk, and it's not > > clear to me that that's a more useful behaviour than just > > throwing a usage error. > > You say the project was renamed, which means that `svn cp' was not > involved.
Renames are modelled as copy+delete in SVN. Cheers, Stefan
