On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 at 11:41, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> [ moved to svnbook-dev@. Please remove users@ from replies. ] > > sebb wrote on Sat, 14 Dec 2019 09:23 +00:00: > > The document > > > > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.serverconfig.pathbasedauthz.html > > > > says: > > > > "The value of each option describes the user's level of access to the > > repository path: either r (read-only) or rw (read/write)." > > > > However it's also possible to omit the value, which means no access. > > > > S. > > I think that's not a bug. Did I say it was? > You're quoting the introductory part of the > chapter, which is just that: an introduction, not a reference manual. > But it can be taken to mean that there are no other possible values. > The «foo =» syntax is described later on, in the section about > overriding permissions (look for the example with "/bug-142/secret"). > > What change would you suggest? > > "either r (read-only) or rw (read/write)." => "either r (read-only), rw (read/write) or omitted(no access)." Cheers, > > Daniel >
