On Apr 18, 2019, at 14:04, Mun Johl wrote:
> I was thinking I would do all of the manipulation via linux commands and
> get the structure the way I wanted
What I haven't understood in this thread is why you think that's easier than
using the corresponding Subversion commands.
For example, if you were planning on using "mkdir", "cp" and "mv" to arrange
your new project, why can't you use "svn mkdir", "svn cp" and "svn mv" instead,
and then once you're happy with it "svn commit" it?
> Since many files will be renamed
> and/or moved to different relative locations, the svn log for those
> files would not be maintained anyway (I don't think) by svnmucc.
Why wouldn't it preserve the history? Preserving history is the whole point.
