Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 13:34:04 +0200: > On 04.07.2018 13:25, Michael Ruder wrote: > > Is this really an intentional change? It results in our case in a huge > > amount of duplicated ACL entries and seems a rather drastic change > > regarding backwards compatibility. > > This kind of change is probably not intentional. It does appear that we > need more test cases, though.
https://svn.apache.org/r1835049
