On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:26:38 +0200, OBones <obo...@free.fr> wrote: >Well, maybe I read this wrong, but the manual talks about a master and a >slave, which are tightly related. If I remove the master once the slave >is fully ready to take over its role, I'm not sure it will work >smoothly, hence my question.
I just set up an svnsync system a few weeks back and my read is that the two repositories are basically mirror images of each other, but that the mirror should never be committed to. (Except for svnsync of course, it will shoot the commits performed on the master to the mirror thus replicating the state) But if you decide to take the master off-line at a later time and run with the mirror instead, then what you need to do is modify the hooks that are present on the mirror to disallow commits except from svnsync and whatever sync related hooks you have in place. After that the mirror should act as a regular repository, but you can no longer sync with the original because of colliding revision numbers. -- Bo Berglund Developer in Sweden
