FWIW, I recently made the same decision for the packages we provide at CollabNet. We have stopped providing 32-bit versions for all platforms.
Mark On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Doug Robinson <doug.robin...@wandisco.com> wrote: > Alfred: > > You can blame me for the decision to prune out the 32-bit platform support > from WANdisco. > > I can easily admit to being premature, but I'm finding less demand for > 32-bit and really > question why anyone would continue to run 32-bit at this time? If you > could help me understand > then perhaps I can reverse that decision... > > Thank you. > > Doug > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Alfred von Campe <alf...@von-campe.com> > wrote: > >> We are not quite ready to move to CentOS 7 yet, but hopefully will soon. >> However, I don’t understand why the dependencies are different for i686 >> and x86_64 on the same CentOS 6 platform for Subversion 1.9.X. Up to >> version 1.9.4-1, WANdisco provided binaries for both architectures. >> >> Alfred >> >> >> > On Apr 7, 2017, at 20:46, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Alfred von Campe <alf...@von-campe.com> >> wrote: >> >> Does anyone on this list have a pointer to a repo that hosts the >> latest 32-bit (i686) Subversion binaries for RHEL 6? I’ve been using the >> WANdisco SVN Repo 1.9 (http://opensource.wandisco.co >> m/centos/6/svn-1.9/RPMS), but it only has version 1.9.5-1 for 64-bit >> (x86_64). The latest 32-bit binaries in that repo are for version 1.9.4-1, >> which are almost a year old. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alfred >> > >> > I tried, some time back, to publish SRPM building tools for >> > subersion-1.9.x and 1.8.x over at https://github.com/nkadel/. I >> > eventually had to throw in the towel as the component dependencies for >> > compiling the latest Subversion exceeded my time to backport and >> > provide separate, system compatible builds of various libraries. But >> > you're welcome to poke them and take a shot at getting it to RHEL 6. >> > >> > I also admit that with RHEL 5 and CentOS 5 obsolete, CentOS 6 has also >> > gotten quite long in the tooth. Can you update to CentOS 7? >> >> > > > -- > *DOUGLAS B ROBINSON* SENIOR PRODUCT MANAGER > > T +1 925 396 1125 > *E* doug.robin...@wandisco.com > > World Leader in Active Data Replication™ > *Find out more wandisco.com <http://wandisco.com/>* > > THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY AND MAY BE > PRIVILEGED > > If this message was misdirected, WANdisco, Inc. and its subsidiaries, > ("WANdisco") does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and destroy the > message without disclosing its contents to anyone. Any distribution, use or > copying of this email or the information it contains by other than an > intended recipient is unauthorized. The views and opinions expressed in > this email message are the author's own and may not reflect the views and > opinions of WANdisco, unless the author is authorized by WANdisco to > express such views or opinions on its behalf. All email sent to or from > this address is subject to electronic storage and review by WANdisco. > Although WANdisco operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept > responsibility for any damage whatsoever caused by viruses being passed. > -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
