Hi Stefan, First of all thank you for the answer.
----- Mensagem original ----- > De: "Stefan" <luke1...@posteo.de> > Para: users@subversion.apache.org > Enviadas: Domingo, 19 de fevereiro de 2017 9:31:26 > Assunto: Re: .svn/wc.db as group writable > > Hi Carlos, > > do you really need one working copy to be shared alongside multiple > users? I understand there might be cases where this is reasonable, > but > usually I'd suggest to have one WC per user. I take it that if you > change this, this would solve the problem you are facing, no? > You're right and I do this is not common, however there is a special case where the repos need to be shared with multiple users. > On the other side, the SVN version you are using is quite ancient and > no > longer supported. I'd suggest you to upgrade to SVN 1.9.5 (or at > least > to 1.8) if possible. Note that even SVN 1.7.14 is years old and not > the > latest build of the 1.7-branch (which would be 1.7.22). At least > consider upgrading to SVN 1.7.22 to determine whether the problem you > are facing was a bug in SVN which got already solved. > I'll update as you suggested. > On the specific issue: I'm not getting completely what problem you > are > facing. Are you expecting that SVN sets the group for .svn/wc.db > according to some group you set up by itself so it's readably/usable > by > other users than the one who did the repository checkout? > > Regards, > Stefan > So, I have set umask 002 and it works for all files except on .svn/wc.db - maybe I'm wrong and this is not a SVN problem. Again, I know this is unusual situation but is how we need to work. Cheers, -- Carlos
