> On Dec 20, 2016, at 8:31 AM, "Matt Garman" <matthew.gar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Matt Garman <matthew.gar...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> Looking at the Subversion 1.7 release notes[2], and also my own >>> testing, it appears that what I could do to make this easy for >>> everyone is to upgrade all CentOS 6 clients to subversion-1.7 (i.e. >>> have subversion-1.7 everywhere on the client side). Then everyone can >>> do an "svn upgrade" on all their working copies and go about their >>> business as usual. The svn server can stay CentOS 6 / subversion-1.6 >>> for now (probably done much later in the overall upgrade process). >> >> From experience, it's that easy. There is no Subversion 1.7 in the >> supported repos, and Subversion 1.9 is (from personal experience) >> awkward to backport to CentOS 6. So it may take some work or >> searching. I used to publish SRPM tools over at github, but I stopped >> a while ago. > > Thank you, that is very encouraging. I was able to compile svn-1.7 > from the vanilla sources on CentOS 6, and my colleague is a pro at RPM > packaging. So no worries on that front! > > Thanks again, > Matt
WANDisco has freely available subversion binaries for numerous subversion versions for centos 5, 6, and 7 (and lots of other operating systems. We are currently using one of the 1.8 versions on both centos 6 and 7 clients. Don't know if that would be 1.6 server compatible - our server is 1.8 based as well.
