On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Adam Jensen <han...@riseup.net> wrote: > On 08/21/2016 07:00 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > [snip] >> If your goal is setting up a production environment, I would recommend >> using binary packages system from http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html > > My CentOS (el7.x86_64) machine only has subversion 1.7.14 available: > > % yum info subversion > > Installed Packages > Name : subversion > Arch : x86_64 > Version : 1.7.14 > Release : 10.el7 > Size : 4.6 M > Repo : installed > From repo : anaconda > > There doesn't seem to be an option for subversion 1.9.4. A brief scan of > the offerings at: > > http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html#redhat
You might start from my old work at https://github.com/nkadel/subversion-1.8.x-srpm I used to publish updates for Repoforge, but that's been pretty moribund. > isn't encouraging. CollabNet and WANdisco both require registration, > SummerSoft is either out-of-date or incomprehensible, and: > > https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge > > says: "RPMForge/RepoForge is a dead project. It is not maintained. DO > NOT USE." > > Given the situation, building from source might be a reasonable > approach. I downloaded the 1.9.4 source a few days ago, to have a look > at it, and I will probably need to build it on CentOS-7; so, any > pointers Horst or others might post on this process will be appreciated > (by me, at least).
