Peter Klotz <peter.kl...@ith-icoserve.com> writes: > Instead of "why is the second change not reported" it should be "why > is the first change reported". > > Relevant part of the script:
At this point Subversion has recorded a timestamp for the file. > echo "2" > x > touch -m -t "201212310000.00" x > svn -q status <-- this change is detected by Subversion (why?) The recorded timestamp is not 201212310000.00 so it does not match the file's timestamp and Subversion detects the change. > svn commit -m "" x Subversion records the current timestamp 201212310000.00. > echo "3" > x The file's timestamp is not 201212310000.00 so it does not match the recorded timestamp and Subversion detects the change. > touch -m -t "201212310000.00" x > svn -q status <-- this change is not detected by Subversion (as expected) The recorded timestamp and the file's timestamp are both 201212310000.00 and Subversion does not detect the change. -- Philip
