On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Eric Johnson <e...@tibco.com> wrote:
Yes, I can do that. Probably going to do that in chunks, otherwise it > has the same awful performance profile as svnsync over a low latency > connection. > FWIW, svnsync and svnrdump make identical calls over the network so their performance on the network is identical. Of course svnsync can be resumed though, so I would use that. Your problems make me wonder how svnsync would handle this same problem though. I suppose if svnrdump ends with an error, then we can assume svnsync does as well and does not sync the transaction that fails. So it probably handles it better. Unless you have a specific reason to use a dump file, I would use svnsync to a local file:// URL. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
