On 22.07.2015 02:41, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Andreas Stieger <andreas.stie...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >>> Even if you have two repositories that are identical to each other, one of >>> them will need to be designated the "master", and that will be the one that >>> all commits are made to. >>> >>> Subversion is a one-central-repository system. >> Unless of course one of the lesser known features is used: >> Cross-repository copies and merges actually work (to not use the term >> "supported"). Copies/moves will become additions, inter-revision history is >> compessed and there is no merge tracking. See the three-agrument (copy or) >> merge syntax "svn merge A@N A@M .", where A and "." refer to different >> repositories. >> >> Not that it's recommended in the user's case, but it should be mentioned. >> >> Best approach in the svn space for Mani would be vendor branches based on >> the information shared. > Or investing in a genuine multi-master version of Subversion, which > Wandisco sells. Simply spending some money instead of investing in > hours of hacking and refactoring to make things work for your own > special needs is sometimes.... well, more expensive in other ways.
I have trouble understanding why you keep plugging for SVN MultiSite on this list. Have you ever actually used it? -- Brane
