On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:44:03AM +0100, lejeczek wrote: > hi users > I don't suppose this would be possible without hacking the code, right? > Reason I'm asking is simplicity and clearness in the message. > eg. is when an attempt to lock fails for file is already locked by other > user > why bother users with the path to file on a remote resource? they usually > only get confuse reading too many details > > there is probably more cases where it would be great to have some ways to > configure these error messages > thanks > P.
I don't think adding the ability to customize error messages makes sense. But you can always point out bad error messages so we can improve them. Which message are you talking about exactly?
