On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Ben Reser <b...@reser.org> wrote:

> On 5/15/14, 1:15 AM, Terry Dooher wrote:
> > That's so much clearer now and sounds like something I can definitely
> use.
> > As I understand it, the downside is that the server will reveal path
> components
> > and filenames within restricted areas during log operations?
>
> Don't think you quite understand yet.  If Subversion is revealing path
> compontents/filenames within restricted areas during log then it can be
> revealing file contents (by way of the REPORT method and bulk updates).
>
> The short_circuit setting can only break security in this way if and only
> if
> you have some other module than mod_authz_svn that looks at paths to
> determine
> what access to provide.  Many modules may have different configurations per
> Location, but most don't look at the path like mod_authz_svn does and give
> different answers within the same Location for the same request.  In fact
> I'm
> not aware of any such module that does this that comes with httpd, so you'd
> have to install some 3rd party or custom module to run into this.  Meaning
> for
> the vast majority of users if they're using mod_authz_svn they should have
> SVNPathAuthz set to short_circuit.
>
> The off setting, should never be used with mod_authz_svn.  It's probabbly
> possible to configure things such that you only leak file paths, by
> disabling
> bulk updates.  But I'm not 100% sure that there isn't an edge case that
> wouldn't be missed by that.
>
> For the vast majority of users these rules are true:
>
> Using mod_authz_svn with an AuthzSVNAccessFile set you want SVNPathAuthz
> set to
> short_circuit.
> Not using mod_authz_svn, no AuthzSVNAccessFile set, you want SVNPathAuthz
> set
> to off.
>
> The exception is if you use some weird authorization module like I
> explained above.
>

I recall there is a valid scenario for using "off" and that is when you are
only using authz to restrict write access to some paths.  If all paths in
the repository are readable, then I believe "off" works properly in all
scenarios.  Meaning it is not possible to write to any paths that you do
not have access to.

-- 
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to