> On Nov 16, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Andreas Mohr <a...@lisas.de> wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 04:29:13AM -0500, Geoff Rowell wrote: >> >>> On Nov 16, 2013, at 2:10 AM, Vladislav Javadov <vapaam...@yandex.ru> wrote: >>> >>> rm programs/develop/fasm/tags >>> rm programs/games/mine/tags >>> rm programs/games/snake/tags >> >> Each command argument must be on a separate line: >> >> rm >> programs/develop/fasm/tags >> rm >> programs/games/mine/tags >> rm >> programs/games/snake/tags > > So, does that mean that svnmucc has single-arg support only? > Cause given this example, on the syntax side there's nothing > that would indicate that a new command is following, > rather than further options to the existing command... > (unless "rm" is one of the commands > which are specially recognized as a known-supported command) > > Sorry for my critique (and thank you for your help!) - just sayin'... > svnmucc commands have a fixed number of arguments. Use "svnmucc --help" to see the valid commands.
- Geoff
