Brane, Thanks for your response.
I agree with your statements. Did I miss dependencies on the Subversion web site? I'm using RPMs from Fedora for both architectures (i686 and x86_64) so the complaint is about their distribution I guess. I'm pursuing this avenue with the "user-help" mailing list. I'm NOT rebuilding anything else except for gcc which builds successfully, I get the latest from their repository (I get the same results from the distro version of gcc), otherwise, everything else is from Fedora. I have built libtool from ftp.gnu.org (latest). George... -------------------------------------------- On Sun, 11/3/13, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote: Subject: Re: Build problems on Fedora 19 x86_64 To: users@subversion.apache.org Date: Sunday, November 3, 2013, 12:35 PM On 03.11.2013 20:29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: I'm going to give you my Red Hat/Fedora classic advice. Work From The RPM That's not really helpful. People have legitimate reasons to build from source, and you definitely won't find an (S)RPM with the latest trunk. It really is mostly trivial to build from source on Linux. you just have to make sure you have the headers and libs for all the dependencies installed, and -- apart from Serf -- all of those should have standard development packages on most any Linux distro. The hints about "incompatilbe libc" seem to be implying that at least some of your dependencies are not compatible (whatever that means) with the updated system libraries. You'll have to rebuild those dependencies or, better yet, install them with yum. For example, I suspect you build APR from source, since Subversion is trying to use its copy of libtool. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com