Remember to reply to the list too, not just to individual users.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 00:34, Zvika Castel <zvi...@tase.co.il> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your response. > If it would be easy to implement, than we were out of job :) > > I'm part of the half that thinks that a sharing is important and essential in > a source control product, as long you know what you are doing. > > Let me add some more to this case: > Under the "Slave" folder there is a file (not externals) named "LocalB.txt". > I change this file and also change the externals "FileB.txt" (one change is a > local and the other is externals), commit both changes to the repo and do the > Shaw log (with tortoise) for "Slave" folder: > I see two lines, one for "LocalB.txt" file and 2nd line (in gray) for the > externals "FileB.txt". > This telling me that the information (revprop) is already there, isn't it ? Ah, I didn't read closely enough to see that you were talking about file externals. I was thinking of directory externals, which are quite different. File externals are already restricted to being in the same repository so the difficulties I was thinking of don't apply. > So I come up with a question: > Why on the first case (change only the externals file) there is no log for > that action, and on the 2nd case (change both, local and externals files) > there is a log for both actions ? I don't know why. > b.t.w. how do I enter this into the issue tracker ? http://subversion.apache.org/reporting-issues.html
