On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm cc'ing Ben Reser (who has the above issue assigned to him) and > Ivan Zhakov (who recenty wrote a patch for this). Perhaps they can > shed some light on the current state of "RA session caching". > > As far as I remember from discussions during the Berlin Hackathon, > this was deemed too risky for 1.8, but perhaps within scope for 1.9.
It's on my todo to review Ivan's patch. It seems like the best short term solution and is basically what I had already intended to do.
