On 19.05.2013 11:16, Zé wrote: > On 05/19/2013 10:01 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> If Subversion >> does not support your workflow, then replace Subversion, or change your >> workflow. > > Did you even browsed the thread? This whole thread is on how > subversion does not support branching, and how subversion would be > even better than what it is if it actually supported it.
No. This whole thread is about you insisting that Subversion's model does not contain a first-class objec that would fit your definition of a branch. Your definition is only one of a myriad possibilities. We know about the quirks and shortcomings -- and also strenghts -- of Subversion's object model. Your going on about them does not change them in any way. Your proposals always assume that it's OK to change the model. It is not, for reasons that I've already stated elsewhere. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
