Guten Tag Andreas Krey, am Donnerstag, 20. September 2012 um 13:35 schrieben Sie:
> Im my opinion svn is simply outdated for the types of data I have to deal > with (that is, repos that are not going into the gigabytes range), and > the only thing that keeps people from massive migration is the need to > to interoperate old scripting/tools and the reluctant people who don't > actually care much for vesion control and are happy with committing > from time to time. As long as the latter chain 'us' to an svn server a > migration would be painful. As soon as there is a server that works on > git repos and can reasonably talk svn, a lot of switching will occur, > as a migration doesn't need to pull them along all the way at once anymore. I maybe misunderstand your argumentation but the only thing I read over and over again is: Use git, it's superior. Not that I'm surprised, it's the same argument I read a dozens of times in each and every discussion about git vs. Subversion, but you could save a lot of time if you wouldn't package this small sentence in this much text. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail:thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon.............030-2 1001-310 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
