Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 22:38:54 -0400: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > wrote: > > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 01:31:11 -0400: > >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Philip Martin <phi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.6. > >> > Please choose the mirror closest to you by visiting: > >> > > >> > http://subversion.apache.org/download/#recommended-release > >> > >> Cool. I'm poking at getting a 1.7.6 SRPM set up for it. I am noticing an > >> issue. > >> > > > > In the future you may consider testing the packaging when the tarballs > > are posted for developer testing, rather than only after their public > > release. (at which point they can no longer be pulled) > > Sorry, Daniel: I was busy on one contract until July 31 and just > started a new one Monday. >
Congratulations then :-) No need to apologise --- just wanted to be sure you knew that reporting bugs during the dev testing phase allows us to pull the release before if necessary. > >> * Make mod_dontdothat.so installable from the Makefile. The easiest > >> way to do it is to move it to from "tools" to "subversion", parallel > >> to subverson/mod_dav_svn, and as a loadable httpd module, it requires > >> special attention. > >> > >> * Make the other Subversion tools installable. It should be > >> straightforward to make the other contents of the "tools" directory > >> compiled and instlalled into the 'toolsdir', typically > >> /usr/local/bin/svn-tools, defined in the Makefile.in. It's not > >> currently used in subverson-1.7.x, but is used in the trunk for the > >> "svnmucc" tools. > > > > Are you aware of 'make install-tools'? > > I looked in the Makefile and didn't see it, unlike 'install-man", > "install-swig-rb", etc. But sure enough, it works. Gotta love > sophisticated and impliciit components of Makefiles. Thanks for the > pointer! > I think install-tools is defined in build-outputs.mk (which is generated by build/generator/, and included by Makefile). > Is there some reason it's not included in the default "install" list of > targets? >
