PR wrote on Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 22:12:51 -0700: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Trent Fisher <trent.fis...@oracle.com> wrote: > > svnadmin dump -r0:44444 /some/repos > p1 > > svnadmin dump --incremental -r44445 /some/repos > p2 > > svnadmin dump --incremental -r44446:HEAD /some/repos > p3 > > Then I manually doctored p2 to indicate that the rev is broken (but leave > > the original comment intact), then load all three into a fresh repository > > (cat p1 p2 p3 | svnadmin load /some/new/repos) > > > > The advantage of this is that the uuid and rev numbers remain the same, so > > existing workspaces will work. And this would preserve all other history of > > the given file. > > > > I just did this on a production repository two weeks ago, and no complaints > > so far. > > > > trent... > > > > > >>> I would do slightly differently .. > >>> let us say that 5 10 and 15 are 3 revs of the file to keep it simple > >>> as suggested before I would do the three part dump > >>> but I will load to 9 then look at the diff beween 9 and 15 subtract the > >>> diff for 15 > >>> and checkin as rev 10 to the repository with the expected log and not > >>> failing to mention > >>> that this was engineered checkin [ it will be difficult if the files # > >>> are more for a checkin ..in my case was max > >>> 2 some times 1 file .. since we migrated from CVS > >>>... then continue on to load 11 to 15 .. > >>> just my 2c ... > > sorry if I accidentally broke the posting sequence...
You didn't break threading, but you preceded yoru text by three ">"-quoting levels instead of the normal zero.
