Forgot to say about network - it's LAN 100 Mbit/s. It is very strange first test co https:// 40m 17 sec !!!
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:59 PM, slaventii <xum...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Want to share some of my tests results: >> /trunk - 1.80 GB (1,941,844,940 bytes) - 148,114 Files; 52,519 Folders >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Old Hardware Server - Ubuntu 9.04: >> svn, version 1.5.4 (r33841) compiled Aug 7 2009, 01:44:11 >> co svn:// ~ 23m 32sec >> co https:// ~ 30m 10sec >> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 28% >> >> up svn:// ~ 3m 22sec >> up https:// ~ 5m 04sec >> svn vs https perf, % > 50% >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> New Hardware Server - Ubuntu 12.04: >> svn, version 1.6.17 (r1128011) compiled Dec 17 2011, 16:12:52 >> co svn:// ~ 18m 30sec >> co https:// ~ 22m 47sec >> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 23% >> >> up svn:// ~ 2m 06sec >> up https:// ~ 2m 35sec >> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 23% >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> New Hardware Server - Ubuntu 12.04: >> svn, version 1.7.5 (r1336830) compiled Jul 19 2012, 21:53:29 >> co svn:// ~ 22m 50sec >> co https:// ~ 24m 00sec >> svn vs https perf, % ~ > 5% >> >> up svn:// ~ 2m 38sec >> up https:// ~ 2m 28 sec >> svn vs https perf, % ~ < 7% >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> I can see that in general performance didn't increase so much. >> But difference between svn and http decreased. > > What kind of network connection between server and client? > > The svn version numbers you report, are those the versions of the > server, or of the client, or both? > > -- > Johan
