Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 23:55:04 +0200: > We also talked a bit about the ^/../ in your url's, which was also a > bit of a surprise. We didn't know about that "feature", but it seems > to work fine, and we didn't see a problem with it. Bert added a > regression test for it, so it keeps working in future versions :-).
Or, at the very least, that we don't break it _unintentionally_. :-)
