On 06/26/2012 05:02 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:13:50PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:07 PM,<kmra...@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
Any reason svnsync couldn't grow a "--fail-on-access-error" option?
Sure, I think that could be useful (as long as it's not the default
(backwards compat)).
Would printing a warning not be sufficient?
That would be an improvement, but since it seems like sometimes this
behavior may be desired or expected, it may be better to always print a
warning, and bomb out given an extra option like that suggested by
Kevin, above.
