Will Fleming wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 14:56:50 -0600:
> Daniel,
>
> I sent the original message with nice yellow hilites etc. in HTML/rich
> text pointing out the pertinent info-- I guess that got stripped down
> to plain text, sorry.
Exactly.
> I'll remember this in future postings. Also
Thanks.
> I have since discovered something amiss in my analysis--- I don't know
> what version I had on the system prior to its re-installation. It was
> working fine, then an admin deleted the executable, upon install (v
> 1.6.11) it had issue with line 153... that's the uncommented line
> (note all others are commented out -- with '#' as the first char) the
> ' store-plaintext-passwords = no' line.
>
That's even more fun --- the plain-text version didn't have the leading
space. (You can see below; my mailer doesn't strip leading or trailing
whitespace.)
To the point, though, I wonder what it was considered to be
a continuation of. Perhaps it was something like
foo = bar
# comment
# comment
foo2 = bar2
interpreted as
foo = bar foo2 = bar2
(key 'foo', valud 'bar foo2 = bar2')
(view this emssage as plaintext or as source to get teh right
indentation)
> But also I have noticed other version installations: 1.6.12, and
> 1.6.17 have it with no leading spaces too, so I'm ok leaving it as-is.
>
Yeah, we're not going to fix 1.6.11 bugs at this point. Bugs in 1.6.18
would be a hard sell too, unless they affect 1.7.4 or trunk.
> Will
>
Cheers
Daniel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@elego.de]
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 14:27
> To: Will Fleming
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: annoyance: servers file format-- worked before 1.6.11
>
> Which line did you remove whitespace from? (And please don't say "153".
> Show the line in context, and indicate which of the lines in the context it
> is. Thanks.)
>
> Will Fleming wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:31:29 -0600:
> > Should I log this as a bug?
> > I made an option setting in the servers file prior to version 1.6.11 and
> > all was fine. Just after upgrade, svn complains about no option being set.
> >
> > [etldev@odlbods1 ~]$ svn help
> > svn: /home/etldev/.subversion/servers:153: Option expected
> > [etldev@odlbods1 ~]$
> >
> > I removed the leading spaces to the line setting and then it worked
> > ......
> > # No neon-debug-mask, so neon debugging is disabled.
> > # ssl-authority-files = /path/to/CAcert.pem;/path/to/CAcert2.pem
> > #
> > # Password / passphrase caching parameters:
> > # store-passwords = no
> > store-plaintext-passwords = no
> > # store-ssl-client-cert-pp = no
> > # store-ssl-client-cert-pp-plaintext = no ....
